Case Study
How Stuc-O-Flex Cut Cost Per Lead in Half
How clean tracking and a rebuilt paid program turned a national manufacturer's guesswork into board-ready proof.
Meet Eric Turner
Meet Eric Turner, Director of Sales and Marketing at Stuc-O-Flex International. Stuc-O-Flex is a national B2B manufacturer of stucco and coatings, established in 1988, whose products show up on the kind of projects most companies only dream about. Stanford's Bing Concert Hall. UCLA. Virginia Tech. The University of Washington. The work is world class. The marketing needed to tell that story just as clearly.
Overview
From Outdated Website to Digital Authority
Stuc-O-Flex builds materials that end up on landmark buildings. Concert halls, universities, projects where the specification process is long and the stakes are high. The company had been established since 1988 and earned a reputation that speaks for itself among architects and applicators.
But the digital side of the business was harder to read. The paid search account was producing about sixteen leads a month at roughly $192 each, and it was over-counting conversions. That last part is the one that mattered most. When the numbers are inflated, nobody can tell what is actually working. Good decisions become impossible because the data underneath them is not honest.
When we came in, the first job was not to promise a bigger number. It was to build a number Eric could trust. A national B2B manufacturer answers to a board, and a board deserves clean math. So that is where we started: rebuild the foundation, fix the tracking, and let the real performance show itself.
Challenge
Starting Point
The surface problem was cost. About $192 per lead is expensive for any program, and volume was stuck at roughly a dozen leads a month. But the deeper problem was trust in the data. The account was over-counting conversions, which meant every report told a slightly better story than reality. For a company reporting up to a board, that gap is not just inconvenient. It undermines the whole case for investing in marketing at all.
There was also the matter of the brand. A manufacturer whose products sit on Stanford, UCLA, and the University of Washington should not look like an afterthought online. The web presence needed to match the caliber of the work, and the measurement needed to be honest enough to prove the work was paying off.
- Paid search at roughly $192 per lead
- Only about a dozen leads per month
- Conversion tracking that over-counted results
- No honest baseline to report to the board
- A web presence that undersold a national brand
- National B2B sales cycle with long consideration
Strategy
A Structured Roadmap
We did not lead with a bigger budget or a louder campaign. We led with the truth. Before we could grow anything, Eric needed to see exactly where the account stood, measured the same way before and after, so any improvement would be undeniable rather than a reporting artifact.
From that honest starting point, the plan built itself. A new website to match the brand, a paid program rebuilt on clean tracking, a board-ready baseline, and organic momentum layered underneath. Each phase earned the next.
Launch a New Website
A modern site built to match the caliber of a manufacturer whose products appear on landmark projects. Faster, clearer, and structured so paid and organic traffic had a credible place to land and convert.
Take Over Paid Search With Clean Tracking
We rebuilt the Google Ads program and, just as importantly, fixed the conversion tracking so it stopped over-counting. Every lead reported from that point forward was a real lead, measured apples to apples against the old account.
Build a Board-Ready Baseline
A national manufacturer answers to a board, so we prepared a clear pre-takeover versus current comparison. Same definitions, same math, no inflation. The kind of report that holds up under scrutiny in the room.
Grow Organic Alongside Paid
With SEO running underneath the paid program, organic visibility began to compound, reaching 912 organic clicks per month and building a second channel that does not cost per click.
Results
Quantitative Impact
Once the tracking was honest, the improvement was easy to see and easy to defend. Cost per lead did not just tick down. It was cut nearly in half, on less spend, while lead volume climbed. This is what happens when you fix the measurement first: the gains are real, and they survive a hard look from anyone at the table.
Organic Search Performance (GA4)
-49%
Cost Per Lead
From about $192 to $98 per lead
+50%
Leads
On 24% less ad spend
912/mo
Organic Clicks
Organic building alongside paid results
Keyword Growth (SE Ranking)
+125%
Form Submissions
More qualified inquiries through the site
+181%
Click-Through Rate
Cleaner targeting on the rebuilt account
100+
Peak Monthly Leads
Up from about a dozen before the takeover
Looking Forward
What Comes Next
The foundation is honest now, and that changes everything downstream. With clean tracking in place, every future decision starts from real data rather than a hopeful estimate. The paid program keeps getting more efficient, organic keeps compounding, and the board conversation is grounded in numbers that hold up.
For a brand that has been trusted on landmark projects since 1988, the goal from here is simple: keep the digital presence performing at the level the products already do. Honest measurement, steady growth, and a partner handling it so the team can focus on the work.
Want results like this for your business?
Every partnership starts with a conversation. Tell us where you are and we'll show you what's possible.